Jump to content

Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Translate this page; This page contains changes which are not marked for translation.

Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV

Other languages:

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Commons deletion (policy)
(Missing: 0 timestamps • 0 reasons • 2 subpages) • 0 malformed
110 copyvios • 195 duplicates • 5 adverts • 7 selfies • 262 others
v • d • e

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
  • If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use
* Wikipedia: als | ar | bar | bn | be | be-tarask | ca | el | en | et | eo | fa | fi | fr | frr | he | hr | hy | id | is | it | ja | lb | lt | lv | mk | ms | pt | ro | ru | sl | sr | th | tr | tt | uk | vi | zh | +/−

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
  • Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Closing discussions

In general, discussions should be closed only by administrators.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

File:The Route.jpg

The user had contacted VRT users before (see: {{RaftFilms Permission}})

Not sure but as far as I can remember these two images had been published on Commons for the first time so netcopyvio is not valid.

Hanooz 18:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

SDSS images

Images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) were once non-free many years ago, but are now under CC-BY (https://www.sdss.org/collaboration/#image-use). SDSS images that were deleted in the past should be restored.

Note that SDSS is different from the Digitized Sky Survey (DSS), which allows non-commercial use only; see Commons:Village pump#Digitized Sky Survey. There seems to have been confusion between DSS and SDSS in some old deletion requests, so some of these images might still be non-free.

Deletion requests found with "SDSS", there are surely more:

SevenSpheres (talk) 03:46, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Although I  Support this line of reasoning, note that we must verify that each image is currently posted with the new license. Any images that do not exist on the current site have only the old license and must remain deleted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this is the relevant part, not the part about the SDSS website: All SDSS data released in our public data releases are considered in the public domain. So SDSS image data is in the public domain actually, not CC-BY. That includes, for example, the SDSS data available through Aladin, which I think is the source of most of these images. SevenSpheres (talk) 18:46, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(Jameslwoodward), I did a google search on "have Sloan sdss images always been public domain".
Annoyngly, google now seems to use AI to summarize and try to interpret results, meaning I couldn't link to it. More annoyingly, the same search provides a slightly different answer, each time. But, one time, it provided an explanation for why some of its earliest images were not (immediately) considered "free". In its earliest years, as a courtesy to researchers, images were not made available under a free lisence, right away, so researchers wouldn't worry about being scooped, until after they published their paper. Once the grace period was over, and researchers were presumed to have had time to publish their papers, then all images were considered free. If I understood what it was saying, all images uploaded to their official website are considered free, even from the early years, when their mages were not initially free. Those initially unfree images weren't supposed to be uploaded to their website, until the grace period had passed.
If I understood it, any non-free images someone here acquired, through industrial espionage, or a leaker, would now be considered free, because the grace period expired over fifteen years ago. Geo Swan (talk) 12:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is incorrect. Before 2017, SDSS images were under a non-commercial license. In 2017 this was changed to a free license. Compare the old SDSS image use page with the current page, and see the old update to the Commons category and undeletion request from that time. There was certainly no "industrial espionage, or a leaker" involved here. SevenSpheres (talk) 00:40, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of Stadio Riviera delle Palme

Hi everyone, I'm writing here in order to ask for the undeletion of two images:

They were both deleted in 2013 after this DR. They both depict the en:Stadio Riviera delle Palme, designed by the living architect Vincenzo Acciarri and built between 1983 and 1985. It was commissioned by the Municipality of San Benedetto del Tronto (see here), therefore it fell under Template:PD-ItalyGov in 2006. It'a building built before 1990, so no issue with US copyright. Friniate (talk) 12:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: @Friniate: FYI. --Yann (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Taipei Metro Xinyi line eastern extension.jpg

Obviously, this picture is provided by Taipei Dorts, and it's licensed under {{GWOIA|wikidata-item=Q9105560|zhurl=https://www.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=10FDEA7683714512&sms=AA987E1C50412097&s=3B6C92FD22C01611|enurl=https://english.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=4E3FA84AC9A12D24&sms=5E019B60E5224755&s=52C7D2409618530A}}. --Sinsyuan✍️ 09:42, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: No opposition. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orelha (Cão).png

See also: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2026-02#File:Orelha (Cão).png.

@Yann: This AI image can be used to illustrate pt:Caso do cão Orelha. It was widely used in the media, and it was deleted before we knew it was AI generated: "Foto do Orelha, usada por imprensa e famosos, é falsa e gerada por IA" (The photo of Orelha, used by the press and celebrities, is fake and generated by AI)... And @Thuresson: in case you didn't see, the discussion you mentioned isn't even finished yet (update: It's finished and the article has been kept). Also, pt:Orelha (cão) and pt:Caso do cão Orelha are two different pages. heylenny (talk/edits) 20:56, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Heylenny: First, you declared that YOU are the original author of the image; that false declaration is serious violation of policy. Second, Own work declaration is accepted in Commons ONLY for unpublished works; for anything else that is used eg. in the net the uploader is REQUIRED to provide a free license EVIDENCE, not a free license DECLARATION. Third, as Yann is not Portuguese Wikipedia editor, his opinion whether Portuguese Wikipedia users prefers AI-generated image over a real image is irrelevant. It is up to you to provide evidence of such consensus. Ankry (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: Where, exactly, with evidence, do I say that "[I am] the original author of the image"? I did not say that and did not even upload it. Also, when the image is undeleted, the "author" and "permission" must be corrected using the {{PD-algorithm}} template, as I said before. heylenny (talk/edits) 18:26, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my mistake, it was declared "Own work" by the uploader not by you.
|source=Own work
|author=110280Andre
and here attemted to grant a license on-wiki:
== Licensing ==
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
Anyway, we have no valid license at the moment. Ankry (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The valid license is {{PD-algorithm}}: "This file is in the public domain because it is the work of a computer algorithm or artificial intelligence and does not contain sufficient human authorship to support a copyright claim."! heylenny (talk/edits) 18:41, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose I have to believe that if this AI creation looks enough like the real dog to be useful, creation must have required carefully worded lengthy explicit instructions. Commons and the case law have not yet fully defined when an AI image has required enough specific instructions to be over the ToO, but this surely is a case where {{PD-algorithm}} does not apply. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

We have precedents, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Gaza.webm, showing that the idea that a "carefully worded, lengthy prompt" automatically exceeds the ToO is not established consensus. Those files were way more complex, commercially produced, and of known authorship, yet it was kept under {{PD-algorithm}}. By contrast, the Orelha dog image depicts an extremely common type of dog in Brazil and does not appear to require any particularly sophisticated or highly creative prompt. heylenny (talk/edits) 18:52, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flag map of Canada and United States (American Flag).png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: should be a good stock image, since similar stuff has been reported https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115925888562624963 https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/trump-shares-altered-map-of-us-flag-covering-canada-greenland-and-venezuela/ , and similar image File:Map of Canada with the U.S. Flag over it.png is used. RoyZuo (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag map of Canada and United States (American Flag).png. Yann (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
an image similar or identical to what usa president-elect posted https://www.instagram.com/realdonaldtrump/p/DEjLlrVMpFE/ is in com:scope. RoyZuo (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
actually, i think the one trump posted originated from commons.
as per commons rules, files in use externally should not be deleted so that re-users of commons files are protected from copyright infringement risks. RoyZuo (talk) 21:34, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: per above. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:19, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gainbridge Super League.png

This image (also available here) was deleted for not having a license. It should be undeleted because it's too simple to be copyrightable; {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 20:41, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This is a US women's soccer league. I think the logo is probably below the ToO, but I'd like to see a couple of other opinions. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I agree that it's below TOO US as it's just basic letters and shapes without any distinctive features. Noting that this is used as fair use on en:File:USL Super League.svg; perhaps that should be transferred over?— Preceding unsigned comment added by HurricaneZeta (talk • contribs) 17:25, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Totally fine with that being transferred over. However, it's a bitmap traced version and it definitely has some imperfections, so I'd also like to restore the official PNG version. –IagoQnsi (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: per above. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Demo Buruh Dan Mahasiswa Di Depan Gedung Dpr.webm undeletion

I was one of the student protesters, as part of the BEM of Universitas Indonesia 2025 march line. Had to put my life on the line to take images and videos of the 2024-2025 protests in Indonesia. This was speedy deleted without any reason given. This video in particular was one amongst many that I and my colleagues have collected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaliper1 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Support It was uploaded from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jmi3-VtSwcg and deleted as "failed license review". However the YouTube license is now CC-BY, so we can restore it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: per Jim. License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo ReatrixShop Indonesia.png

  • Reason: I am requesting the undeletion of this logo because it belongs to my company, **PT REATRIX MEDIA INDONESIA**. This logo is a simple geometric design and/or typography that does not meet the "threshold of originality" required for copyright protection in its country of origin (Indonesia) and the US.
  • Copyright Status: It consists only of standard fonts and simple shapes ({{PD-textlogo}}).
  • Utility: This logo is needed for the official corporate profile and to identify the company in relevant articles. I can provide official authorization if necessary, but it should be hosted as Public Domain or under a free license.

--Schbdid52 (talk) 04:32, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose As this company does not have an entry on any Wikimedia project and the file was deleted as an advertisement, it is not in scope. HurricaneZetaC 17:22, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, per HurricaneZeta. Not in scope. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PRASAD PHOTOS1.jpg

This Photo of Mandolin Prasad Indian Mandolin player and composer i need this image of him to be added to the wikipedia page that is published https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N.S._Prasad. If this can be undeleted and made available i can update the wikipedia page to add this picture. Let me know if you need any further clarification. --Pradeepkulkarni1 (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The image appears at https://mandolinprasad.in/gallery.html with "© Copyrights 2023 Mandolin Prasad. All rights reserved". While you may need it, that is not a reason to restore it. You will have to get the actual photographer to send a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, per Jim. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:10, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Divadelní archiv Národního divadla ukázka ze sbírek.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Please undelete per Ticket#2026021710004537, thank you! janbery (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: @Janbery: FYI. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Кугаевский Александр Федорович

Здравствуйте, пожалуйста, разблокируйте загруженную мной фотографию. Вероятно, я неправильно указал дату съемки. Но авторские права на нее принадлежат мне. Это семейное фото, а я внук и непосредственный владелец этой фотографии и прав на нее. На фото мой дедушка. Я пишу о нем статью в Википедии. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 545пятьчетырепять (talk • contribs) 12:22, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose This is about File:Кугаевский Александр Федорович.jpg. Owning a digital or paper copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. This appears to be a formal portrait, so it is likely that the actual photographer or their heir is the only one who can freely license this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, per Jim. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:13, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Traditional Khmer costume made of silk ikat.jpg

I don't think it violated the copyright. The creator posted online, and it's free to use. Please consider for undeleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ttee9898 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Almost everything posted on line, including this, is not free to use. Only items with an explicit free license, which Facebook does not have, can be uploaded to Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: per Jim. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miklavž na Dravskem polju.png

The image of the coat of arms has been published as part of an official text (see [1]) and thus meets the criterion at COM:NOP Slovenia exempting from copyright "municipal coats of arms" that have been published as part of official texts. --TadejM (t/p) 16:12, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The cited page has "© 2022 Lex Localis" and Section I, Articles 2 and 3, of the decree have a variety of restrictions that amount to an ND license. There is nothing like a free license there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Lex localis nor the municipality can claim copyright on materials that are exempted from copyright per the Slovenian legislation (cited on COM:NOP Slovenia). --TadejM (t/p) 13:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose The act mentions explicitly only text of legal acts, not images. Ankry (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinion directly contradicts COM:NOP Slovenia, which is based on scholarly sources. --TadejM (t/p) 21:46, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:معمل السومري للصناعات الحربية العراقية القطاع الخاص 2025.png

  • Logo of Al-Sumari Factory for Iraqi Military Industries, Private Sector

Request for Undeletion of Official Logo – Al‑Sumari Factory Dear Wikimedia Commons administrators, I am writing to formally request the restoration of the official logo of the Al‑Sumari Factory for Iraqi Military Industries

File:معمل السومري للصناعات الحربية العراقية القطاع الخاص 2025.png
Logo of Al-Sumari Factory for Iraqi Military Industries, Private Sector

Contrary to claims made in the previous deletion discussion, this logo is official and authentic, and the factory is a real entity that has been covered in multiple reliable publications, including: Shafaq News article on local production and marketing of rifles: https://shafaq.com/ar/

شفق نيوز Al‑Iraq Today coverage on local arms production: https://iraqtoday.com/ iraqtoday.com Al‑Hadath News report discussing the factory’s activities: https://www.alhadathcenter.net/ وكالة الحدث الاخبارية Al‑Sabah Al‑Jadeed report on AI‑augmented weapons development: https://newsabah.com/ جريدة الصباح الجديد These articles confirm the existence of the factory, its leadership, and its ongoing activities in defense manufacturing. I am prepared to provide additional documentation if needed in accordance with Wikimedia policies. Please reconsider restoring this file, as it meets all criteria for legitimate content under free licensing rules. Thank you for your time and attention. --مرصد القرار (talk) 09:19, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment That something is real does not mean its logo may appear on Wikimedia Commons. We depend upon copyright law here, not upon verification of existence. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:56, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@مرصد القرار: I have corrected the heading; we do not use example files in sections here. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:01, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, my dear. مرصد القرار (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose no evidence for cc-by-sa-4.0 license provided. Ankry (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, how can I send you the proof? I'm ready to prove it.--مرصد القرار (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo AFC Ajax (1928-1991, 2025-).png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo AFC Ajax (1928-1991, 2025-).png. --ManFromNord (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Support A shade of red can not be copyrighted. Thuresson (talk) 14:49, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Support This was kept per the DR cited above and should not have been deleted without a new DR. It's a 1930 logo, so URAA does not apply. The new red patch is well below the ToO. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ciao Niu at アーク森ビル

Ciao Niu is known for Central HK Spotlight: Ciao Niu's Exclusive with Masao Takayama on Contemporary Music - Feat. (2024). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mylenechanspringdale (talk • contribs) 16:50, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Personal image by non-contributor. Please read COM:WEBHOST. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose You can request undeletion after the enwiki article draft is accepted. However, VRT permission may be needed as this is not an original photo from a camera. Ankry (talk) 21:27, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: See above. I blocked this user, as they reuploaded the same file for the third time after multiple warnings. --Yann (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster_de_la_pelicula_Lasuntay.jpg

Solicito la restauración del archivo File:Poster_de_la_pelicula_Lasuntay.jpg. Soy el autor original de esta imagen y la publiqué bajo una licencia libre válida. Considero que la eliminación fue un error. Estoy dispuesto a confirmar mi autoría si es necesario. Leonemfiss (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Policy requires that for movie posters, album covers, and the like, that an authorized official of the copyright holder must send a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"He enviado el correo oficial de autorización como dueño de la productora Nemfius a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. El proceso está en marcha. Gracias por la espera." Leonemfiss (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr._Edith_Wölfl.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2026020210013831. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mussklprozz (talk • contribs) 20:57, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 21:20, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:郷北共和国連邦国章.png

自身によってツールを使用して作成したファイルのため。

久屋夕 (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)久屋夕 02/22/2026[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests&oldid=1151099667"